IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 Shyam Lal Mattu State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. seeking quashing of impugned Charge P-4) issued under Rule 8 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016 to the petitioner for alleged negligence in relat sub-standard new tube-well work at village Mohri, District Kurukshetra. 2. to interfere with the impugned P-4), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage. 3. 4. 5. 01.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Shyam Lal Mattu Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RS Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of impugned Charge-sheet dated 4) issued under Rule 8 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016 to the petitioner for alleged negligence in relat standard material found on 05.04.2025 at the site of construction of a well work at village Mohri, District Kurukshetra. After arguing for some time, when this Court is no to interfere with the impugned Charge-sheet dated 4), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand d 01.07.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19366-2026 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RS Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. writ petition has been filed by the petitioner sheet dated 26.05.2026 (Annexure 4) issued under Rule 8 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016 to the petitioner for alleged negligence in relation to .04.2025 at the site of construction of a well work at village Mohri, District Kurukshetra. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined sheet dated 26.05.2026 (Annexure 4), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, at this stage. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No writ petition has been filed by the petitioner 26.05.2026 (Annexure 4) issued under Rule 8 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and ion to .04.2025 at the site of construction of a inclined 26.05.2026 (Annexure 4), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.02 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.