Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2016 DAILYLAW 3886 (PNJ)

MAHESH GOYAL AND ANR v. PRITAM KAUR TH LRS

CR/1267/2016 · 2026-05-14

Pankaj Jain

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203-I CR-1267-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:-14.05.2026 Mahesh Goel and another … Petitioners Versus Pritam Kaur (since deceased) through LRs ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Advocate, (through video conferencing) with Mr. Gurjit Singh Saini, Advocate and Ms. Mallika Passi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Madan Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. ***** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby evidence of the plaintiffs was ordered to be closed. 2. Though from the impugned order it is evident that the plaintiffs failed to exercise due diligence in pursuing the suit. However, in the interest of justice, this Court finds that the impugned order needs to be modified to the extent that the plaintiffs are allowed one effective opportunity to lead their entire evidence. 3. Mr. Gupta though raises objection that by now the defendants have adduced their entire evidence and the same has been ordered to be closed, but this PANKAJ KAKKAR 2026.05.21 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CR-1267-2016 (O&M) ( 2 ) Court finds that the objection raised by Mr. Gupta cannot be accepted as the defendants led their evidence during the time the present revision petition was pending before this Court. The act of Court should not prejudice rights of the parties. 4. In view of above, present revision petition is disposed off with the aforesaid modification in the impugned order. 5. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off. 6. It is made clear that in case the plaintiffs fail to lead evidence despite availing opportunity as granted hereinabove, the impugned order shall come in vogue and no further opportunity will be granted to the plaintiffs. 14.05.2026 ( PANKAJ JAIN ) Pankaj JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2026.05.21 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh