IN TH 217 Dakshin H M/s Digvij CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU concurrent whereby su been decree stage of arg the matter dates i.e. 1 01.4.2016, to non-repr and on 20.11.2015 RSA-2141-2010 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.21 Date of decision :-09.03.202 hin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd Versus Digvijay Stone Crusher AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. Ms. Chahat, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The defendants are in s urrent judgments and decrees of th eby suit filed by the respondents/pla decreed by both the Courts below. The matter pertains to the ye of arguments. The order sheets show atter was issued on 03.1.2011; and i.e. 10.2.2011, 04.4.2011, 18.10.201 .2016, 10.12.2019 and 06.12.2023 the representation on behalf of learned on 19.5.2011, 01.10.2013, 30.0 1.2015 adjournment was sought by 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.2141 of 2010 (O & M) .2026 m Ltd. and others …..Appellants …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ate for the respondent. second appeal against the of the learned Courts below, nts/plaintiffs for declaration has the year 2010 and is still at the s shows that notice of motion in ; and thereafter on most of the .10.2011, 25.3.2013, 07.2.2014, 23 the matter was adjourned due arned counsel for the appellants; 30.09.2014, 09.4.2015 and ht by learned counsel for the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.10 19.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellants. has been ca appearing f the Divisio appellants the present time of the appellants have adopt neither the pursuing th option exce March 09 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-2141-2010 (O & M) llants. Even today also, despite secon een called, there is no representation o Moreover, it is clarified by aring for the respondent that the prese ivision Bench judgment in RSA-4181 A bare reading of the abo s have exhibited an utterly casua resent litigation. It is to be appreciate of the Court has been expended in aff s in the interest of justice. On the adopted an utterly casual and careles er the appellants nor their counsel ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, 9, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 second round, when the matter ation on behalf of appellants. ied by learned proxy counsel e present case is not covered by 4181-2016. e above facts shows that the casual attitude in the pursuit of reciated that very valuable public in affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the appellants areless approach. It is clear that unsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.10 19.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document