RSA-5459- IN THE HIG 227 Davinder Ku Urmila Devi CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent Courts wher possession o of separate p Courts. 2. the same w 11.05.2016 been directe with register not been don hearing i.e. to furnish th weeks; and o all the respon -2015 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o der Kumar Jain and another Versus Devi and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiffs are in s rrent ex parte judgments and decrees whereby their suit for declaration sion of residential property described arate possession by partition has been The present second appeal is o ame was issued by the Predecesso 6. Thereafter, vide order dated directed to furnish correct addresses egistered covers. However, despite lap en done by learned counsel for the a g i.e. 11.07.2025, learned counsel for ish the correct address of all the resp ; and on his doing so, fresh notices we respondents for today. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5459-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the appellants. in second appeal against the ecrees rendered by both the District ration that they are co-owners in cribed in the plaint; and for decree been dismissed by both the District al is of the year 2015 and notice in ecessor Bench vide order dated ated 19.10.2016 the appellant had resses of all the respondents along ite lapse of 09 years the needful has r the appellants. On the last date of el for the appellants had undertaken e respondents within a period of 04 ces were also ordered to be issued to the trict s in cree trict e in ated had long has e of ken f 04 d to RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.08 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-5459- 3. has been rec 4. address argu case and add 5. adjournment order-sheet(s is pending ad or effecting appellants present matt dismiss the s 6. 7. 06.05.2026 rishu -2015 (O&M) -2- Pursuant thereto following off en received:- “Counsel for the appellant ha respondents No. 1 to 3 on 08.08 to them through ordinary pro Delhi), No report has been rece Today, when learned counsel fo s arguments on merits, learned counse nd address arguments. There is no justification to nment made by learned counsel for th sheet(s) reveal(s) for the last more tha ding adjudication before this Court onl ecting service upon the respondents nor their counsel are seriously t matter. Thus, this Court is left wi the same for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ng office report dated 06.05.2026, nt has filed correct addresses of 8.08.2025 thereafter notice issued process & through SHO (New received so far.” nsel for the appellants was asked to counsel prays for time to prepare the ion to entertain the request of for the appellants as, perusal of the re than 10 years, the present appeal only for completion of pleadings dents. It is clear that neither the riously interested in pursuing the left with no other option except to any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 026, of ed ew d to the of f the peal ings the the t to RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.08 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.