122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.16753 of 2016 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Arjan Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1-State. None for respondent No.2. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought an adjournment to complete his instructions. 2. Today, none has come present on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 11.05.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.05.11 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD