IN T 204 Smt. Shant Mange Ram CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU impugned o Civil Judge filed by the Commission that the ma instructions counsel for petition. April 28, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision No Date of decision : Shanti and others Versus Ram AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advo for the petitioners. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present revision pe gned order dated 01.7.2016 (Annexure Judge (Jr. Divn.), Hathin vide which th by the petitioner under Order 26 Rule 9 C issioner for demarcation has been dismi At the very outset, learned couns he matter has been amicably settled be ctions to withdraw the present revision p el for the petitioners prays for withdr Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH on No.4354 of 2016 (O & M) sion :-28.04.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA Advocate sion petition is for setting aside the exure P-1) passed by the learned ich the application (Annexure P-2) ule 9 CPC for appointment of Local dismissed. counsel for the petitioners, submits led between the parties and he has ision petition. Accordingly, learned withdrawal of the present revision any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 17.56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document