Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IOIN-FAO FAO-1058
IN THE HIG
231
Babu Khan
Kailash and
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
claimant, se awarded to learned Mot bearing M.V Section 166
2.
order-sheet r was adjourn behalf of the absence of admitted by dated 06.07. for the appe AO-1058-2016 in 58-2016 (O&M)
-1-
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
IOIN
FAO
Date o Khan
Versus and others
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
None for the appellant.
Ms. Mansi Verma, Advocate fo
Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advoca for respondent No. 3-Insurance I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been f , seeking enhancement of compens to him vide impugned Award date d Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, M.V.A. Petition No. 114 of 19.05 n 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
The matter pertains to the sheet reveals that since the inception djourned either at the request or on a of the appellant. On the last date of h e of learned counsel for the appe ed by the Predecessor Bench of this C 06.07.2022 and letter No. 1215 date e appellant was requested to furnis
D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IOIN-FAO-1058-2016 in FAO-1058-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.01.2026
.… Appellant
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate for dvocate rance Company. been filed by the appellant/injured- mpensation amount of ₹2,61,000/- rd dated 16.09.2015, passed by the unal, Faridabad, in a claim petition 19.05.2024/24.08.2013 filed under t, 1988. the year 2016. Perusal of the eption of present appeal, the same r on account of non-appearance on te of hearing i.e. 24.09.2018, in the appellant, the main appeal was f this Court. Thereafter, vide e-mail 5 dated 28.02.2025 learned counsel furnish correct present address of
the ition nder the ame e on the was mail nsel s of RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
IOIN-FAO FAO-1058
respondent needful. As Category fo
3.
counsel for t e-mail, but appellant. A final hearing
4.
has exhibite litigation. It Court has b appellant in adopted an u appellant no matter. Thus same for non
5.
6.
stand dispose
28.01.2026 rishu
AO-1058-2016 in 58-2016 (O&M)
-2-
dent No. 2, but no steps were taken As such, the present appeal has for completion of service upon the
As per office report dated 09 el for the appellant has been informed , but despite that none has put in . As such, the main appeal is orde earing today itself.
A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording in the interest of justice. On the d an utterly casual and careless approa nor his counsel is seriously inter Thus, this Court is left with no other for non-prosecution.
Ordered accordingly.
IOIN as well as pending app
disposed of. 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
taken by learned counsel to do the l has been listed under the IOIN on the unserved respondents. 09.05.2025/28.01.2026, learned ormed about the date fixed through ut in appearance on behalf of the s ordered to be taken on Board, for
facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the multiple opportunities to the n the other hand, the appellant has approach. It is clear that neither the interested in pursuing the present o other option except to dismiss the g application(s), if any, shall also
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No the IN rned ugh the , for llant sent the the
r the sent the also RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.