Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2016 DAILYLAW 3741 (PNJ)

SUNITA RANI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/22700/2016 · 2026-02-04

Jagmohan Bansal

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 206 CWP-22700-2016 Date of Decision: 04.02.2026 L/EHC SUNITA RANI ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ravinder Phogat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 04.09.2016 (Annexure P-1) whereby respondent has proposed to recover penal rent. 2. Learned State counsel during the course of hearing confirmed that penal rent was of Rs.23,000/- and there is possibility that respondent has already recovered the said amount. 3. On 04.11.2016, this Court while issuing notice of motion stayed recovery of penal rent. As per parties, partial amount has already been recovered. Considering the amount involved and efflux of time, order dated 04.11.2016 is hereby made absolute. It is made clear that petitioner shall be neither entitled to refund nor liable to pay differential amount, if any. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.02.04 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22700-2016 -2- 4. Disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE February 04, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.02.04 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document