CRM-M-71930- IN THE (136) DALJEET STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. S Mr. N MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under S and 120B of IPC a 2. The statement recorded of 27.07.2016, he the petitioner alon of an unlawful ass being armed with -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS r. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advoca Mr. Sumit Chahal, Advocate for the p r. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of F nder Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 302 f IPC added later on) at Police Station The aforementioned FIR was reg corded by the complainant Wazir alleg 6, he was standing in front of the hou r alongwith the co-accused reached th ful assembly they entered inside the h with weapons and opened an assaul JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-71930-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent
ANISHA BATRA
dvocate and r the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.312 dated 27.07.2016 2, 302 and 506 of IPC (Section 325 tation Narnaund, District Hisar. registered on the basis of the alleging therein that in the evening e house of his brother Baljeet, when ched there. By forming membership e the house of his brother Baljeet by assault upon the family members of M) 2026 nder ) 2016 325 the ning hen rship et by rs of AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.20 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71930- his brother. H instantaneously. O The other member to the hospital. La After registration investigation som could not be app initiated against hi He was arrested on investigation and s crime. After com him. 3. It is a falsely implicated and other materia and neither of th offences. The tria prosecution witne would not serve a be released on bail 4. Learn argued that there a -2025 (O&M) 2 . His brother Baljeet succumbe sly. On clamour being raised, the acc embers of the family also sustained se . Later on, Dalbir Singh succumbed tration of FIR, investigation procee n some of the accused were also arr e apprehended. Proceedings under inst him and he was declared a procla sted on 29.11.2024 and is in custody s n and suffered disclosure statement ad r completion of investigation, supplem It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. He is in custody aterial witnesses have since been exa of them has implicated the petition he trial will take considerable time to witnesses have been examined so f erve any useful purpose. It is, therefo on bail. rned State counsel while referr there are serious and specific allegati cumbed to the injuries and died the accused fled away from the spot. ined serious injuries and were rushed umbed to the injuries on 29.07.2016. proceedings were initiated. During lso arrested. The present petitioner under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. were proclaimed offender on 23.04.2018. stody since then. He was joined into ent admitting his involvement in the supplementary challan was filed qua l for the petitioner that he has been stody since long. The complainant en examined before the Trial Court etitioner in commission of subject ime to conclude as only 14 out of 41 d so far. His further incarceration therefore, argued that he deserves to referring to the status report has llegations against the petitioner. He died spot. shed 016. uring er were 18. into n the qua been inant ourt bject of 41 ation es to has . He AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.20 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71930- evaded his arrest presence could be absconding, if ext not deserve to be a 5. This C for both the parties 6. The accused is alleged on the person of succumbed to the absconder for a lo since then. The m depositions have b has implicated the considerable time been examined so has come on recor the period spent b circumstances but case, this Court i served by keeping petition is allowe -2025 (O&M) 3 arrest for a long time and was declar uld be secured after a long period of t if extended benefit of bail. It is thus to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis parties at considerable length. The petitioner by forming an unla lleged to have voluntarily caused simp son of members of the complainan to the injuries so sustained by the or a long time and was arrested on The material witnesses have been exa have been placed on record and the sa ted the petitioner in the murder of th e time to conclude as only 14 out of 4 ned so far. Taking into consideration n record in the form of sworn depositi pent by the petitioner in the custod es but without meaning to make any ourt is of the considered opinion tha eeping the petitioner in custody anym llowed. The petitioner is ordered to declared a proclaimed person. His od of time. There are chances of his is thus, argued that the petition does ubmissions made by learned counsel n unlawful assembly with the co- d simple as well as grievous injuries lainant party. Two of them had y them. The petitioner remained d on 29.11.2024 and is in custody en examined. Copies of their sworn the same show that neither of them r of the victims. The trial will take ut of 41 prosecution witnesses have ration the nature of the evidence that epositions of the material witnesses, custody and the attendant facts and any comment on the merit of the on that no useful purpose would be anymore. Accordingly, the present ered to be released on regular bail, His f his does unsel - uries had ined tody worn them take have that sses, and f the ld be esent bail, AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.20 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71930- subject to his fur Court/Duty Magis to apply for cance other subsequent c 7. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin 8. Since any, is rendered in 19.02.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 4 is furnishing personal/surety bonds t Magistrate concerned. However, it wi cancellation of bail in case the petiti uent case. In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
   onds to the satisfaction of the trial r, it will be open for the prosecution petitioner is found involved in any y FIR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
trial ution any t the g an n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.20 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.