IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110-3 FAO-3798-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 SATYA DEVI ...Appellant Versus RESHAM SINGH AND ORS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- None for the appellant. Ms. Ravinder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Prajapati, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) Despite the matter having been called out three times, there has been no appearance on behalf of the appellant. In view of these circumstances, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution, with liberty to revive it, if necessary. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (MANDEEP PANNU) 25.09.2025 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANU 2025.09.26 15:49 I am the author of this document Chandigarh