IN TH 265 Dakshin Engineer, Dalbir CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. against the the suit file injunction 2. appellants/d present app view of Se decided by 2016, title Another’ RSA-280-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.28 Date of decision :-21.04.202 hin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nig neer, OP Division, DHBVN Jind and Versus AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Madhur Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Judgepreet Singh Warring for the respondent. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants/defendants hav st the concurrent findings of the lear uit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for ction has been decreed by both the Co At the very outset, llants/defendants submits that the ques nt appeal as to whether jurisdiction of of Section 145 of the Electricity A ed by the Hon’ble Division Bench o , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. Su ’ vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.280 of 2023 (O & M) .2026 Nigam through Executive nd and another …..Appellants …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate arring, Advocate nts have filed the present appeal e learned Courts below whereby for declaration and mandatory the Courts below. tset, learned counsel for e question of law involved in the tion of the Civil Court is barred in icity Act, 2003, has since been ench of this Court in RSA-4181- Sub Divisional Officer and .2025. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 12.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. dispute the ‘no objecti terms of jud 4. allowed, dismissed respondent remedy as 5. made in th res judica respondent 6. April 21, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-280-2023 (O & M) Learned counsel for the res te the aforesaid factual and legal posit objection’, in case, the present second s of judgment dated 14.05.2025 (supra In view of the above, the and the suit filed by the issed on the ground of juri ndent/plaintiff is at liberty to take r dy as available, in accordance with law It is made clear that any evid in the impugned judgments and dec dicata in any subsequent proce ndent/plaintiff. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 respondent/plaintiff does not l position and submits that he has second appeal is disposed of, in (supra). the present second appeal is the respondent/plaintiff stands jurisdiction. However, the take recourse to the appropriate law. y evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as proceedings initiated by the if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 12.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document