103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14196-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.04.2026 Ashwani Pathak ... Petitioner(s) Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate and Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate for respondent No.2. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. On 02.04.2026 the following order was passed : “None had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the previous date. Today again, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being called twice since morning. In view thereof, let notice be issued to the petitioner through Civil Judge (Senior Division) concerned, returnable 24.04.2026. To be shown in the urgent list.” 2. As per the office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with the report that the house was found locked. There is no other alternate address except for the one mentioned in the memo of parties. YOGESH SHARMA 2026.04.27 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh CWP-14196-2016 (O&M) 2 3. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 24.04.2026 Yogesh Sharma ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2026.04.27 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh