Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2016 DAILYLAW 3652 (PNJ)

HEM LATA v. PREM PARKASH AND OTHERS

RSA/5267/2019 · 2026-04-24

Nidhi Gupta

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-4363-C RSA-5267- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 Hem Lata Prem Parkash CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Section 151 CPC 12.10.2016 between the parties before the learned of this Court. 2. that vide last order dated 21.11.2025, the present second appeal along with connected second ‘Sonal Soni and Conciliation Centre of this Court for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. C-2026 in -2019 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM- RSA Date of Decision: Versus Prem Parkash and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. APS Rana, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kabir Sarin, Advocate for respondent No. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishchal Chetanya, Advocate for respondents No. 5 and 6. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the application (CM Section 151 CPC is for disposal of the main appeal 12.10.2016 in terms of Settlement Agreement dated between the parties before the learned Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that vide last order dated 21.11.2025, the present second appeal along with connected second appeal bearing No. RSA Sonal Soni vs. Prem Parkash and others’, was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -4363-C-2026 in RSA-5267-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA . APS Rana, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kabir Sarin, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Senior Advocate with ocate CM-4363-C-2026) filed under is for disposal of the main appeal which is fixed for Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026 arrived Mediation and Conciliation Centre It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that vide last order dated 21.11.2025, the present second appeal along appeal bearing No. RSA-1664-2020, titled as ’, was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. As such, the parties in the filed under which is fixed for arrived Mediation and Conciliation Centre It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that vide last order dated 21.11.2025, the present second appeal along 2020, titled as ’, was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court for exploring the possibility of As such, the parties in the RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.27 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM-4363-C RSA-5267- present second appeal have settled their dispute amicabl that only respondents No. 5 and 6 in the present appeal who are appellant(s) in connected second appeal bearing No. RSA not party to the wish to agitate their claim through the aforesaid second appeal. 3. Agreement dated 4. that the present second appeal may be disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement dated C-2026 in -2019 (O&M) -2- present second appeal have settled their dispute amicabl that only respondents No. 5 and 6 in the present appeal who are appellant(s) in connected second appeal bearing No. RSA not party to the present Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026, as they wish to agitate their claim through the aforesaid second appeal. Learned counsel further refers Agreement dated 24.02.2026 which reads, as follows: “6. During the mediation proceedings, Mr. Sonal Soni s/o late Mr. Rajinder Soni – respondent No. 6 in RSA No. 5267 of 2019 and appellant in RSA No. 1664 of 2025 participated but respondents No. 5 and 7 did not participate. During the mediation, Mr. Sonal settlement with the first and second parties hereinabove, and therefore, he is not part to the present settlement. Respondent No. 5 and 7 (in RSA-5267 respondent No. 6 did not participate in the proceedings. The parties hereinabove agree that the said respondents are not necessary for settlement of the dispute since the amount towards compen be paid by second party to the first party towards her claim.” It is accordingly prayed by learned counsel for the parties that the present second appeal may be disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026. present second appeal have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that only respondents No. 5 and 6 in the present appeal who are appellant(s) in connected second appeal bearing No. RSA-1664-2020 are present Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026, as they wish to agitate their claim through the aforesaid second appeal. Learned counsel further refers to clause 6 of the Settlement which reads, as follows:- During the mediation proceedings, Mr. Sonal Soni s/o respondent No. 6 in RSA No. 5267 of 2019 and appellant in RSA No. 1664 of 2025 – had participated but respondents No. 5 and 7 did not participate. During the mediation, Mr. Sonal Soni failed to reach any settlement with the first and second parties hereinabove, and therefore, he is not part to the present settlement. Respondent 5267-2019) mother and sister of respondent No. 6 did not participate in the mediation proceedings. The parties hereinabove agree that the said necessary for settlement of the dispute since the amount towards compensation has been agreed to be paid by second party to the first party towards her claim.” by learned counsel for the parties that the present second appeal may be disposed of in terms of Settlement . It is submitted that only respondents No. 5 and 6 in the present appeal who are 2020 are present Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026, as they to clause 6 of the Settlement During the mediation proceedings, Mr. Sonal Soni s/o respondent No. 6 in RSA No. 5267 had participated but respondents No. 5 and 7 did not participate. Soni failed to reach any settlement with the first and second parties hereinabove, and therefore, he is not part to the present settlement. Respondent 2019) mother and sister of mediation proceedings. The parties hereinabove agree that the said necessary for settlement of the dispute sation has been agreed to that the present second appeal may be disposed of in terms of Settlement RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.27 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM-4363-C RSA-5267- 5. Counsel for respond of the appellant, and have made no objection to the prayer of the appellant. 6. 7. 4363-C-2026) is is taken up on Board for hearing today itself disposed of, at between the parties before the Mediation this Court. 8. and conditions of the aforesaid Settlement 9. 24.04.2026 rishu C-2026 in -2019 (O&M) -3- Learned counsel for the respondents including learned Senior Counsel for respondents No. 5 and 6, have admit of the appellant, and have made no objection to the prayer of the Heard. In view of the afore-noted facts, 2026) is allowed; and the main second appeal is taken up on Board for hearing today itself disposed of, in terms of Settlement Agreement dated at between the parties before the Mediation Needless to say that both the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 24.04.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Learned counsel for the respondents including learned Senior 6, have admitted aforesaid submissions of the appellant, and have made no objection to the prayer of the noted facts, the present application (CM- and the main second appeal (RSA-5267-2019) is taken up on Board for hearing today itself; and the same stands in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026 arrived at between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of y that both the parties shall abide by the terms Agreement dated 24.02.2026. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel for the respondents including learned Senior aforesaid submissions of the appellant, and have made no objection to the prayer of the stands arrived and Conciliation Centre of y that both the parties shall abide by the terms RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.27 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.