SURESH KUMARI v. SUBHASH KUMAR (deceased) through his LRs Umrila Devi and others
CMP.M/291/2026 · 2026-03-23
Virender Singh
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2771 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2771 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Suresh Kumari & Others versus Subhash Chand (deceased through LRs & Others RSA No. 431 of 2016 23.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellants. Mr. Hakam Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for respondents No.1 (a) to 1(d), 2, 4 to 6. Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
CMP (M) No. 291 of 2026 By way of the present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to delete the name of respondent No.3-Sandhya Devi, who, as per the application, has expired on 24.01.2020. Deletion of her name has been sought on the ground that her legal representatives are already on record as respondents No.2, 4, 5 and 6. In view of the no objection made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the application, under consideration is allowed and the name of respondent No.3, is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties, subject to all just exceptions. Necessary corrections be made in the cause title of the appeal. Amended memo of parties, annexed with the application, be taken on record. The application stands disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge March 23, 2026 (ps)