Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
34-ARBP-657-16.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 657 OF 2016
Bharati S Khandhar ...Petitioner Versus Dhirsingh Yadav And 2 Ors ...Respondents
_______ Ms. Janki Sampat, for Petitioner. Ms. Sheeal D. Gulhane for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Dhir Singh Yadav, Respondent No.1 and Authorised Representatives of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. _______
CORAM:
AARTI SATHE, J. DATE:
16 SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties have tendered the Consent Terms arrived at between the Petitioner and the Respondents, whereby the disputes between the parties have been settled. The aforesaid Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2. The Consent Terms are signed by the respective parties and are also identified by their respective Advocates. In view thereof, the aforesaid Arbitration Petition stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Interim Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
3. List the matter for compliance on 21 October 2026.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) Mane JYOTI RAJESH MANE Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2026.09.16 18:34:44 +0530