Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 2629 (BOM)

SYED MUSHTAQUE ALI SYED SHOUKAT ALI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/3355/2016 · 2026-09-04

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

925-WP.3355.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 WRIT PETITION NO. 3355 OF 2016 Syed Mushtaque Ali Syed Shoukat Ali VERSUS The State of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. R. R. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for the Respondents. ... CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. After arguing the matter for some time and being apprised of the view of this Court on merits, the learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make an appropriate application afresh before the authorities. We find no reason why such an application cannot be entertained by the authorities without leave of the Court. However, if the petitioner is willing to make any such application, this Court cannot preclude the petitioner from doing so. 2. Writ Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. 3. It is open for the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the authorities, if so advised. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Sayyed 1/1 2026:BHC-AUG:41084-DB