Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 2617 (BOM)

SOU. ANJANA AMARSING PAWAR v. SHRI. MADHUKAR GANPAT WAGHURILKAR (DECD. THR. LR. SHASHIKALA MADHUKAR WAGHURLIKAR AND ORS. )

SA/859/2016 · 2026-09-03

Civil Appealbody2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neeta Sawant 902-SA-859-2016.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 859 OF 2016 Sou. Anjana Amarsing Pawar Through her Son and Constituted Attorney Mr. Pradeep Amarsing Pawar …. Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) : Versus : Shri. Madhukar Ganpat Waghurilkar Deceased-through his Legal Heirs Shashikala Madhukar Waghurlikar & Ors. . Respondents … (Orig. Defendants) Ms. Apeksha Tandel a w. Mr. B.K. Barve i b. B.K. Barve & Co. for the / / Appellants. Mr. Tushar Sonawane with Ms. Ekta Patil, for the Respondents. Mr. Pradeep Pawar, C.A. of Appellants present. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 3 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C : 1) Ms. Tandel, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Appeal. Leave granted. Second Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NOS. 1 of 2 Thursday, 3 September 2026 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2026.09.05 10:53:17 +0530 Neeta Sawant 902-SA-859-2016.docx [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NOS. 2 of 2 Thursday, 3 September 2026 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2026.09.05 10:51:52 +0530