SHAIKH SHAKIL S/O SAYYAD SADIK v. RIZWANO BANO W/O SHAIKH SAHKIL AND ANR
APPLN/5963/2016 · 2026-08-29
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2600 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2600 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 3 941-APPLN-5963-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5963 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (St.) No.240 OF 2016 Shaikh Shakil Sayyad Sadik VERSUS Rizwano Bano Shaikh Sahkil And Anr ….. Mr. Y. K. Bobade, Advocate for Applicant. …..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 29 AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :
1. This Court, on 12 August 2026, observed that despite the
order dated 4 January 2017 directing the applicant to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- in this Court, no amount has been deposited till date.
2. On 12 August 2026, while granting time to deposit the amount, this Court made it clear that if the amount directed above was not deposited by the next date, the instant Criminal Revision Application would be dismissed. Hence, as there are no instructions from the learned counsel for the applicant regarding compliance with the aforesaid order, the instant Revision Kiran Kawre
2 / 3 941-APPLN-5963-2016 Application is dismissed.
3. Needless to say, any ad-interim order passed by this Court stands vacated.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that he tried to contact the applicant by sending the letter and the same has been returned to him.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant states that he has tried to send the letter on the address mentioned in the record, however, the same is returned as “not claimed”. In that view of the matter, the Court cannot merely sit over the matter and keep the matter pending. Once it is found that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with, despite granting sufficient time, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. The said letter is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
6. The notice sent by the learned counsel for the applicant, pointing out the order dated 12 August 2026, was also not received by the applicant, as stated by the learned counsel for the applicant. However, it is found that the applicant has not deposited the amount as directed by this Court since the year 2017. Kiran Kawre
3 / 3 941-APPLN-5963-2016 Therefore, the instant Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for non-compliance of the order.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) Kiran Kawre