THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SINA KOLEGAON MEDIUM PROJECT,PARANDA v. BALNATH BHAGWAN SABLE AND OTHERS
FA/3848/2016 · 2026-08-24
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2574 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2574 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
FA 3848/16 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3848 OF 2016 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SINA KOLEGAON MEDIUM PROJECT,PARANDA VERSUS BALNATH BHAGWAN SABLE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajale Gulab B. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Korde Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr. M.S. Patil ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : August 24, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and award dated 30.4.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Paranda in LAR No. 590/2011 (Old LAR No. 224/2003).
3. All the learned counsel appearing for respective parties tendered across the bar copy of the order dated 18.7.2026 passed by this Court in First Appeal No.1511/2014 (The Executive Engineer, Sina Kolegaon Project, Paranda, Osmanabad Vs. Mahadeo deorao Miskin (Died) Thr. L.Rs. And Ors.) and submit that present matter is covered in view of the order passed by this Court in FA No. 1511/2014 (supra). Mr. G.B. Rajale, learned counsel points out that the only difference is in respect of date of award. However, the lands in the present matter and in FA No. 1511/2014 were acquired under the same notification, for the same project and from the same villages. Therefore, they submit that the present appeal can be disposed of in view of the order passed by this court in FA No. 1511/2015. 2026:BHC-AUG:38543
FA 3848/16 2
4. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the respective parties, and in view of the admitted position that the controversy involved in the present appeal is identical to the one decided by the this Court in First Appeal No.1511/2014 (supra), I see no reason to take a different view. The present appeal, therefore, deserves to be disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order. Hence, the following order:
O R D E R (i) The first appeal stands dismissed. (ii) The respondents/claimants are permitted to withdraw the amount, if deposited by the appellant/acquiring body in this Court with accrued interest thereon, if any, in accordance with law. (iii) Pending civil application, if any, also stands disposed of.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/