Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 2552 (BOM)

INDU VISHWANATHRAO JADHAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERS

WP/8343/2016 · 2026-08-17

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5 WP NO. 8343 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8343 OF 2016 Indu Vishwanathrao Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anothers … • Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for Respondents - State … CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. By an order dated 08.06.2026, notice was issued to the petitioner, as the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner has since been elevated as a Judge of the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. However, the said notice could not be served, as the petitioner was not found at the address mentioned in the petition, as reflected from the bailiff's report. 2. It further appears that since the year 2016, the petition has not been circulated. The aforesaid circumstances clearly indicate that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition. 3. Apart from the above, the petition challenges an order of termination. The petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy available under law. Therefore, even otherwise, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly disposed of. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Jhs/ 1/1 2026:BHC-AUG:37158-DB