SHRI. RAM DASHRATH KEDARI AND ORS. v. SHRI. PARSURAM D. KEDARI AND ORS.
WP/6819/2016 · 2026-03-27
Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2527 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2527 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
902_WP_6819_16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6819 OF 2016 Ram Dashrath Kedari and others … Petitioners vs. Parsuram D. Kedari and others … Respondents Mr. Tejesh Dande a/w. Mr. Bharat Gadhavi, i/b. Tejesh Dande and Associates for petitioners. Adv. D. J. Shejul a/w. Mr. Jitendra Mahatre for respondent No.1. Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar, AGP for respondent No.4 – State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE :
27th MARCH, 2026 P.C. : . This petition was circulated today on the ground that the petitioners wish to withdraw the same.
2. Today, when it was called out in the morning session, we found that the learned counsel for the petitioners was not in Court, while the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submitted that all the petitioners themselves are present in Court and that they wish to withdraw the petition. In that light, we kept back the matter to give an opportunity to the learned counsel for the petitioners to appear before this Court.
3. In the afternoon session, the petition was called out again, when Mr. Dande, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has no idea of circulation of this petition and no notice was given to him. He submitted that the petitioners have not instructed him 1/2 PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date: 2026.03.27 18:49:11 +0530
902_WP_6819_16.doc with regard to this petition. In that light, this Court may discharge his appearance on behalf of the petitioners in this petition.
4. We interacted with the three persons claiming to be the petitioners. They submitted that they wish to unconditionally withdraw the petition and produced their original Aadhar Cards to ascertain their identities. Upon ascertaining the same, the original Aadhar Cards were returned back to them and photocopies tendered by them were taken on record.
5. In view of the above, Advocate Mr. Dande is discharged from appearing for the petitioners in this petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 2/2 Priya Kambli