TRILOKCHAND ZUMZARLAL CHANDAK v. SURESH RAMCHAND BHADANG AND ANOTHER
FA/824/2016 · 2026-03-09
Shri Neeraj P Dhote
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2437 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2437 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2 52-fa 824-16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 824 OF 2016
Trilokchand Zumzarlal Chandak Vs. Suresh Ramchandra Bhadang and anr. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.B.Mirza,Advocate for the Appellant. Ms.Anita Mategaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.
DATE : 09/03/2026
1. The learned Advocate for the Appellant tenders on record the pursis stating that, the Respondent No.1/Original Claimant expired on 05.01.2017 and the Appellant could not trace out the legal representative/legal heirs of the deceased/Respondent No.1. He submits that, the Appellant No.1 be permitted to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to file afresh as and when the legal heirs/legal representatives initiate the execution proceedings or disclose the identity. The said pursis is taken on record.
2. The Appellant is allowed to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to file afresh in the event of the contingency Kavita
2 / 2 52-fa 824-16 mentioned in the pursis. The amount of statutory deposits by the Appellant be refunded after following due process of law. The Court fees be dealt with as per rules.
JUDGE Kavita