MOHD. MAZAHARUDDIN GAFOORUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. MOHD. AZIMUDDIN SIDDIQUI AND ANR
ALP/106/2016 · 2026-08-21
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2400 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2400 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2.cri.alp.106.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ALP) NO.106 OF 2016 Mohd. Mazaharuddin Gafooruddin Siddiqui … Applicant Versus Mohd. Azimuddin Siddiqui and anr. … Respondents *** None for the Applicant. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for Respondent-State. *** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 21 AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :
1. On 09.01.2026, following order was passed :-
“. On the last occasion, none appeared on behalf of the Applicant. Even today, three is no appearance on behalf of the Applicant.
2. Stand over to 6th February 2026.
3. It is made clear that, if on the next date, none appears for the Applicant, this Court will be constrained to pass an appropriate order.”
2. On 14.08.2026, the following order was passed:
1. The Applicant is original complainant challenging order of acquittal arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
2. None appears for the Applicant. On 09.01.2026 also nobody had appeared for the Applicant.
3. In the circumstances, stand over to 21.08.2026, as an opportunity. To be listed ‘for dismissal’ Vina Khadpe 1 VINA ARVIND KHADPE Digitally signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE Date: 2026.08.21 18:13:33 +0530
2.cri.alp.106.2016.doc
3. Today, the matter is listed for dismissal. However, nobody appears for the Applicant. Considering, the consistent default, it appears that the Applicant is not interested in proceeding with the matter.
4. Therefore, Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Vina Khadpe 2