SAMBHAJI VAIJINATH BEDADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/762/2019 · 2026-03-18
Shri Abasaheb D Shinde, Shri Sandipkumar C More
Contempt Petitionbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2343 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 1004- C.P. 762-2016.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1004 CONT. PETITION NO. 762 OF 2019 IN WP/8307/2018 SAMBHAJI VAIJINATH BEDADE ….Petitioner VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS …..Respondent ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Dr. Supriya L. Pansambal AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 : Mr. J.M. Murkute Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. A. R. Tandale …...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 18, 2026
ORDER:-
1. The learned counsel for respondent No.4-The District Social Welfare Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur placed on record a copy of letter dated 17.03.2026 issued by respondent No.4 to learned Registrar of this Court, mentioning that respondent No.6 has already forwarded the updated service book of the petitioner and the same is received by respondent No.4. The said letter is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
2. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 made a statement that the said updated service book will be sent to respondent No.5-Zilla 2026:BHC-AUG:12423-DB
(2) 1004- C.P. 762-2016.odt Parishad, Gadchiroli along with the bills of arrears of salary within a week. We record this statement as an undertaking to this Court on behalf of respondent No.4.
3. Needless to state, that respondent No.5 - Zilla Parishad, Gadhchiroli, as per the directions of this Court, shall decide the said proposal and pay arrears of salary to the petitioner as early as possible.
4. In view of the same, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/