THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI v. MRS. CHRISTY MURLIDHARAN
CAF/3081/2016 · 2026-01-28
Shri Jitendra Shantilal Jain
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2337 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2337 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sayyed
30-(i)CAF.3045.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3045 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1598 OF 2019 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Applicant/Appellant Versus Arvind Indramal Patangia ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3081 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1598 OF 2019 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Applicant/Appellant Versus Christy Murlidharan ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1598 OF 2019 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Applicant/Appellant Versus Omprakash Suganmal Israni ...Respondent _____________________________________________________ Mr. Pradeep M. Patil for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms. Kavita Sharma i/by Ganesh & Co. for the Respondent. _____________________________________________________
CORAM :
JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATE :
28 JANUARY 2026 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AS:4172
Sayyed
30-(i)CAF.3045.2016.doc P.C.:
1. The impugned order quashes notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (MMC Act). The impugned
order was passed on 31 October 2015 and till today the suit structure has not been demolished because of the quashing of the notice. The civil applications were also not pressed till today. There is an order in favour of the respondent quashing the impugned notice. Therefore, no case is made out for stay of the impugned order.
2. Civil Applications are dismissed.
[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ] 2 of 2 Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/01/2026 18:23:11