SHAKUNTALA BABAN GARJE v. GRAMPANCHAYAT NAHULI THROUGH ITS GRAMSEVAK AND OTHERS
WP/11065/2016 · 2026-03-04
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2329 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2329 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
37 WP No.11065.2016 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11065 OF 2016 SHAKUNTALA BABAN GARJE VERSUS GRAMPANCHAYAT NAHULI THROUGH ITS GRAMSEVAK AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. D. R. Korde Advocate for Respondents No. 3 to 7 : Mr. Abhijit S. More ...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Date : 4th March, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to passage of time, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, the present petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Omkar Joshi 2026:BHC-AUG:9127