8-CRA-174-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2016 Sayaji Dnyandeo Londhe and others ...Applicants versus Satish Raghunath Londhe and others ...Respondents *** None for the Applicants. *** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C: 1. On 05.02.2026, following order was passed; “1. None for the Revision applicants. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 10 points out that Revision Application is arising out of the proceedings under section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906. He pointed out that by order dated 15.03.2012, the application filed by the Respondents was allowed, thereby making available the subject matter road. He further points out that this order was challenged by present Revision Applicants by filing a Revision before Sub- Divisional Officer, Madha Division, Kurduwadi and by order dated 30.11.2015, the said Revision is rejected, thereby confirming the order in favour of the Respondents. He submits that the impugned order is executed long ago. 3. Perusal of the record indicates that present Civil Revision Application is never argued on merits and, either nobody has appeared for the Applicants or request for adjournment has been made. There is no interim relief granted in favour of the applicants. Shailaja 1 SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2026.02.13 11:16:14 +0530 8-CRA-174-2016.doc 4. In these circumstances, it appears that the Revision-Applicants are not interested in proceeding with the matter. 5. Even then, as a final opportunity to the Applicants to appear and proceed with the matter, list the matter on 12th February, 2026. To be listed under the caption ‘for Dismissal’. 3. Today, the matter is listed for dismissal. Nobody is appearing for the Applicants. 4. The Civil Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. [M.M. SATHAYE, J.] Shailaja 2