SHRI DIGAMBAR VITHOBA KAMBLE AND ANR v. SHRI BAPU SADHU KAMBLE AND ORS
AO/99/2016 · 2026-06-12
Shri Sandesh D Patil
Civil Appealbody2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 2308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
907-AO-99-2016 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 99 OF 2016 Shri Digambar Vithoba Kamble & Anr. …...Appellants VERSUS Shri Bapu Sadhu Kamble & Ors. …...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 134 OF 2016 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 99 OF 2016 Shri Digambar Vithoba Kamble & Anr. …...Appellants VERSUS Shri Bapu Sadhu Kamble & Ors. …...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 616 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 99 OF 2016 Shri Digambar Vithoba Kamble & Anr. …...Appellants VERSUS Shri Bapu Sadhu Kamble & Ors. …...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 1322 OF 2016 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 99 OF 2016 Shri Digambar Vithoba Kamble & Anr. …...Appellants VERSUS Shri Bapu Sadhu Kamble & Ors. …...Respondents ... Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke a/w Adv. S. R. Vasekar for Appellants. None for the Respondents. ... Shubham 1/3 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.06.15 10:24:19 +0530
907-AO-99-2016 (C).doc
CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED: 12th JUNE 2026 P.C.:-
1. The present Appeal From Order is directed against the
judgment and order dated 14th August 2015 passed by the learned District Judge, Sangli, whereby the application filed by the Appellant seeking stay was rejected in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014.
2. The impugned order has been in operation since 14th August
2015. Thus, it has remained operative for more than eleven years. In the circumstances, there is no reason to interfere with the said order after such a long lapse of time. The interests of justice would be better served by directing the expeditious disposal of Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER:: a) The Appeal From Order is dismissed. b) The learned District Judge-6, Sangli, is requested to decide Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014 as expeditiously as possible. Since the matter has been pending for the last eleven years, the learned District Judge is requested to dispose of the same within a period of one year from today. Shubham 2/3
907-AO-99-2016 (C).doc
3. The Appeal From Order stands disposed of accordingly.
4. In view of the disposal of the Appeal From Order, all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) Shubham 3/3