Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 2299 (BOM)

CHANDRAKANT SAKHARLAL SURATWALA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/9149/2016 · 2026-01-23

Shri Kishore C Sant, Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ethape ( 1 ) 16-WP-9149-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 WRIT PETITION NO. 9149 OF 2016 Chandrakant Sakharlal Suratwala VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Yadnesh V. Dharmadhikari h/f Mr. Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Dr. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, AGP for Respondent-State.. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 23rd JANUARY 2026. PC :- 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice issued by the Respondent-Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002. There is an alternative remedy available to the petitioner. The petition therefore stands dismissed. 2. It is open for the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities, if law provides. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]