Dr. Kamlendra Kumar Suman v. THE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS
MJC/3308/2016 · 2026-08-18
Ritesh Kumar
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1913 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1913 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3308 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18450 of 2015 ====================================================== Dr. Kamlendra Kumar Suman Son of late Sudarshan Prasad Resident of Sahabjpur,Near Mosque, P.o. Bhikhampur, P.s. Ahiyapur, District Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. Dr. Saket Kushwaha, The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University , Kameshwar Nagar, Darbha
3. Dr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University , Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Adv For L.N.M.U : Ms. Alka Verma, Adv For the State : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, AC to AAG-15 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 18-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. It appears from the order dated 29.07.2025 that all the amounts were paid to the petitioner, however the Group Insurance and DDA amounts were to be paid within a period of two weeks. It has further been recorded that the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that whether Group Insurance amount has been paid to the petitioner or not, he is not aware. Yesterday, when the matter was called out, the learned counsel for the parties were directed to seek instructions that whether the same has been paid or not.
Patna High Court MJC No.3308 of 2016(5) dt.18-08-2026 2/2
3. Today, when the matter has been called out, the
learned counsel for the L.N.M.U., submits that payment of the Group Insurance amounts to the tune of Rs. 87250/-, has already been made by the University on 23.11.2018. In view of the
submissions, this Court finds that now nothing remains to be paid to the petitioner, in terms of the order under contempt i.e.
order dated 10.05.2026 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18450 of 2015.
4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed.
shital/- (Ritesh Kumar, J) U