Satya Narayan Ram and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr
CR. MISC./52494/2016 · 2026-07-29
Rana Vikram Singh
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1893 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1893 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52494 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Satya Narayan Ram and Ors son of Late Sheo Muni Ram
2. Hari Narayan Ram son of Late Amawas Ram
3. Nand Kishore Ram son of Late Yadu Nandan Ram
4. Rajkumar Ahir son of Late Murat Ahir
5. Neur Ram son of Late Gobardhan Ram
6. Basavan Ram son of Late Yadu Nandan Ram
7. Purnbasi Ram son of Late Chandradeo Ram
8. Ramdeo Ram son of Late Jai Nandan Ram
9. Lalan Gaur son of Late Subedar Gaur
10. Jamuna Singh son of Late Sigan Singh
11. Bharat Gaur son of Late Sheo Bhajan Gaur
12. Jokhan Ram son of Late Chandradeo Ram
13. Bridhi Chand Ram son of Late Sudarshan Ram
14. Rajkumar Ram son of Late Sriram Ram
15. Arvind Ram son of Late Ram Sagar Ram
16. Bhagelu Ram son of Late Mola Ram
17. Amar Ram son of Late Jagdish Ram
18. Sukhari Ram son of Late Lalan Ram
19. Nageshwari Devi wife of Late Siddha Nath Kamkar All residents of village Dharampura, p.s. Itarhi, district Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. State Of Bihar and Anr
2. Rama Kant Mishra @ Raghav Das resident of village Dharampura, Math, p.s. itarhi, district Buxar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 29-07-2026 Mr. Hemant Prasad Singh, learned Senior Advocate duly assisted by Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel, appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52494 of 2016(4) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 behalf of the petitioners, at the very outset, prays for withdrawal of the instant application on account of it being infructuous to which, Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No. 2 and Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State, did not object.
2. The application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Smriti/ Saurabh/- (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U