Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr
CR. MISC./47668/2016 · 2026-07-27
Rana Vikram Singh
body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1851 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1851 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47668 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2015 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar@ Akhilesh Kumar Yadav son of Babulal Prasad resident of village – Surjudih , P S- Sirdala ,District -Nawada ... ... Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Pintu Kumar son of Vijay Prasad singh resident of Mohalla – Garpar ,P S – Nagar ,District - Nawada ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 6 27-07-2026 After having argued the matter at length, Mr. Sanjay Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of the application, albeit, with liberty to file an appropriate application before the learned trial Court at an appropriate stage, taking all the defence which has been taken herein in this application.
2. Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, learned A.P.P. is also present in the case.
3. In view of the aforesaid prayer, this application is
disposed of with aforesaid liberty, with a direction to the trial Court to consider the application if so filed by the petitioner at an appropriate stage, without being prejudiced by the order of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47668 of 2016(6) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 this Court, as this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.
Smriti/ Supratim/- (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U