IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2353 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10812 of 2006 ====================================================== Meena Devi Wife of late Amar Lal Sah, Resident of Mohalla- C/o Mrs. Sarita Singh(near T.P.S. College), Chandmari Road, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Cum Secretary Road Construction Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Arun Kumar Singh. 2. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Laxmi Narain Das, Son of knot known to the petitioner, The Engineer-in- Chief-Cum-Additional Secretary-Cum- Special Secretary, Road, Construction Department,Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Bhawani Nandan, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Chief Engineer(South), Road, Construction Department,Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. Sri. K.C. Mishra, Son of not known to the Petitioner, The Chief Engineer(North), Road, Construction Department,Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. Sri B. Kartikey, The Administrator, Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board, Pant, Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 7. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiw Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.K. Sinha, GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): for initiating a contempt of court proceeding against the contemnors-Opposite Patna High Court MJC No.2353 of 2016(2) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 Parties for their wilfull, deliberate and intentional disobedience of the order/direction dated 06.04.2011 passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar in C.W.J.C.No. 10812/2006. 3. The show cause of the opposite party nos. 1 to 5 shows that steps have been taken and payments made. 4. It is expected from the opposite parties that whatever due still remains, the same has to be cleared in next 90 days. Failure to do so, the petitioner will have the liberty to agitate the matter afresh. 5. MJC No. 2353 of 2016 is disposed of with aforesaid observation. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U