Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1766 (PAT)

Shyama Surgical Sansthan and Anr v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/7671/2016 · 2026-07-02

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7671 of 2016 ====================================================== 1. Shyama Surgical Sansthan and Anr 2. Smt. Renu Mishra, Managing, Director, Shyama Surgical Sansthan, 5 G.M. Road, Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Principal Secretary Cum- Chairman Labour and Welfare Committee, Vikash Bhawan, Patna Bihar. 3. The Executive Director Incharge R.B.S.Y. Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana Bihar State Labour and welf 4. The HDFC ERGO, General Insurance Company limited, Registered office at Ist Floor, 165-166 Backbay R 5. The State Head, HDFC ERGO, General Isurance Company Limited, Regis- tered office at Uma Complex, Fres ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sc22- Kundan Bahadur Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 6 09-04-2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The matter is coming for hearing since 27.07.2023, on the said day there was no representation on behalf of the respondent Nos 4 and 5 and it was directed to post this matter on 05.09.2023 for filing counter affidavit by the respondent Nos 4 and 5. Further the matter was taken up on 05.09.2023 on the said day, the matter was listed for 26.09.2023 with direction to file counter affidavit by respondent Nos 4 and 5 as a last indulgence also with condition that no further adjournment will Patna High Court CWJC No. 7671 of 2016(6) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 be granted. But the matter has taken up on 15.03.2024, and on the said day learned counsel for the petitioner sought one week time as a last indulgence. 3. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court is of the considerable view that the petitioner has no interest to evince with the matter. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. manishkumar/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U