Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1497 (ORI)

DEEPAK KUMAR ROUT v. AMIT KUMAR NAYAK

CMP/1629/2016 · 2026-08-20

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1629 of 2016 [CNR No.- ODHC010278902016] 1. Deepak Kumar Rout 2. Pramila Giri 3. Nayana Jena 4. Sanjay Kumar Nayak 5. Surendra Nath Rout 6. Asit Kumar Nayak 7. Sambhunath Nayak 8. Bishnumohan Nayak 9. Panchanan Nayak 10. Gobinda Samal 11. Ganesh Prashad Nayak …. Petitioners None -versus- 1. Amit Kumar Nayak 2. State of Odisha, represented by Collector, Bhadrak 3. Tahasildar, Bhadrak 4. Headmaster, Khirasahi, Nodal UP School, Khirasahi, Dist.-Bhadrak …. Opp. Parties None (For Opposite Parties No.1 and 4) Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, Additional Standing Counsel (For Opposite Parties No.2 and 3) CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 07. 20.08.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This matter is taken up from the weekly list. 2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 28.01.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhadrak in Civil Suit No.195/2015-I (Annexure-9) rejecting the petition filed by a 3rd party under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC. 3. While issuing notice on 18.01.2017, further proceeding in the suit had been stayed by this Court. 4. None appears on behalf of the Petitioners or Opposite Parties No.1 and 4 when the matter is called. 5. In view of the fact that more than ten years have elapsed since the impugned order was passed, it can be safely be presumed that in the meanwhile the suit has been disposed of or has progressed considerably for which no counsel are appearing in the matter. No useful purpose would therefore, be served by keeping the CMP pending. 6. The CMP is accordingly dismissed. 7. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated of. Misc. Case No.1712 of 2016 stands disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Madhusmita