Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1420 (ORI)

GHARBASA MAHAKUR v. MANGULU MOHAKUR

CMP/1074/2016 · 2026-07-29

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1074 of 2016 Gharbasa Mahakur …. Petitioner Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. H.S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. Mangulu Mohakur 2. Sukadev Mohakur 3. Dinabandhu Mohakur 4. Haribandhu Mohakur 5. Kurupa Mohakur 6. Fula Patra 7. Hazar Bastia 8. Kunti Mohakur …. Opp. Parties Mr. Trilochan Nanda, Advocate (on behalf of O.P. No. 1 to 3) CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 05. 29.07.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CMP has been filed by the Petitioner (Plaintiff) challenging the common order dated 18.03.20216 passed in Civil Suit No.54 of 2013 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balangir allowing the application of the defendant to file certain documents and rejecting the application filed by the plaintiff to recall order dated 06.01.2016 where prayer has been made to permit the plaintiff to adduce further evidence had been rejected. 2. Vide Order dated 08.08.2016 notice had been issued in the matter and further proceeding in Civil Suit No.54 of 2013 had been stayed. 3. Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile, the suit has been disposed of, so the CMP has been rendered infructuous. 4. Mr. Trilochan Nanda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Parties No.1 to 3 confirms the submission of Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, learned counsel. 5. In view of above submission, nothing remains to be decided in the CMP, which is therefore dismissed. 6. Misc. Case No. 1090 of 2016 stands disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Madhusmita