Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1382 (ORI)

DUKHISHYAM PANDA v. BISHNU PRASAD PANDA

CMP/806/2016 · 2026-07-24

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 806 of 2016 1.Dukhishyam Panda 2.Nalini Kumari Panda @ Nalini Panda … Petitioners None -versus- 1.Bishnu Prasad Panda 2.Siba Prasad Panda 3.Satya Prakash Panda 4.Rojalini Panda 5.Monalisha Panda 6.Laxmipriya Sahoo Opp. Parties Ms. Sonali Panigrahi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Kalpataru Panigrahi, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 24.07.2026 04. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. The CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khordha in C.S. No.368 of 2010 allowing the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 by the plaintiffs (petitioners) subject to payment of Rs.500/- as cost to the defendants. 2. None appears for the petitioners when matter is called. 3. While issuing notice on 19.07.2016, further proceedings in C.S. No. 368 of 2010 pending before the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khordha, had been stayed by this Court. Thereafter, the matter has not been listed before this Court. As nearly ten years have elapsed since then, Utkalika and no counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners, it can safely be presumed that the said civil suit has, in the meantime, been disposed of. 4. The CMP is, therefore dismissed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner for revival of the CMP within four weeks, in case any cause of action still survives. 3. (Savitri Ratho) Judge NAYAK Orissa, Cuttack Signature Not Verified