Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.20596 of 2016
Prasana Kumar Senapati …. Petitioner
Represented By Adv.- None
-versus-
Collector, Khurda and others …. Opp. Parties
Represented By Adv.- Mr. J.K. Bal, AGA (for opposite party Nos.1 and 2)
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Order No.
ORDER 18.03.2026 (Hybrid mode)
02.
1. Heard Mr. J.K. Bal, learned Additional Government Advocate for the opposite party Nos.1 and 2.
2. None appears for the petitioner on call, though the names of five counsels have been reflected in the cause list.
3. The petitioner on 23.11.2016 filed this writ petition praying for a direction to the opposite parties to dispose of his Mutation Case bearing No.2450/2016 within a stipulated period and further to direct the opposite parties to issue Record of Rights in his favour.
4. It is seen that after scrutiny of this petition, the office by its report dated 23.11.2016 found that the petitioner did
not submit any material along with his said writ petition pertaining to pendency of the said Mutation Case bearing No.2450/2016 and the matter was pending since then for rectification of the defects by the petitioner. However, the petitioner did not take any step(s) for rectifying the said defect(s).
5. By efflux of time, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak), Judge
Rabindra
Designation: Personal Assistant