Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1312 (ORI)

DIBYASINGH DAS v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/2431/2016 · 2026-03-19

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2431 of 2016 Dibyasingh Das …. Petitioner None -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Satya Brata Mohanty, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 19.03.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the following relief: “Under such circumstances, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon‟ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this case and after hearing the parties may direct the Opp. Party No.3- Tahasildar, Derabish to demarcate the schedule land to resolve the dispute and enquiry to allegation made against the Opp. Parties and punished the authority involved in the mea „matter under proper provision of law in the interest of justice; And any other order/orders, direction; directions as deemed just and proper be passed;” 3. Having regard to the nature of the prayer and the fact that such prayer relates back to the year 2016, it appears that no surviving cause may presently subsist. Be that as it may, in the event any such application is still pending in the office of the Tahasildar, Derabish, the question of demarcation, if required, shall be taken up and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, provided the cause of action still survives. A free copy of this order be supplied to the learned AGA for onward transmission to the Tahasildar concerned for compliance, if required. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge AKPradhan Designation: Senior Stenographer