Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1311 (ORI)

SANTOSH KU.NAIK v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/22445/2016 · 2026-03-24

R K Pattanaik

Writ Petition (Civil)body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.22445 of 2016 Santosh Kumar Naik …. Petitioner Mr. K. P. Mishra, Advocate -Versus- Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Rath, Senior Panel Counsel Mr. G. Sethi, Advocate for O.P. Nos.1 and 3 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 24.03.2026 11. 1. Mr. Rath, learned Senior Panel Counsel is present. Mr. Sethi, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.1 and 3 is also present. Accepting the memo for withdrawal as at Flag-F and recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of, however, with the liberty to file a fresh one if the cause of action still survives. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Designation: Junior Stenographer