MINTU SARMA v. THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHAKALI TEA ESTATE
WP(C)/2543/2016 · 2026-07-13
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1219 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1219 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010224272016
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2543/2016 MINTU SARMA S/O LT. PRABHAT CH. SARMA, R/O BARBHETE, BORGOLIGAON, P.O.
BAHADUR CHARIALI, MAN-KHULI, PIN-786601, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHAKALI TEA ESTATE P.O. HOOGRIJAN, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786601, REP. BY ITS MANAGER Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.P KALITA, MRS.A BHATTACHARYYA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A SARMA, MR.A JAHID,MR.K KALITA,MR.S CHOUDHURY,MR.S N SARMA Linked Case : WP(C)/5301/2014 THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHAKALI TEA ESTATE P.O.- HOOGRIJAN DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN- 786601 REP. BY ITS MANAGER. VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3 MINTU SARMA and ANR S/O- SRI PRABHAT CH. SARMA R/O- BARBHETE BORGOLIGAON P.O.- BAHADUR CHARIALI MAN-KHULI DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM.
2:THE PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT ASSAM AT DIBRUGARH PIN- 786001. ------------ Advocate for : MR.K KALITA Advocate for : MRS.A BHATTACHARYYA appearing for MINTU SARMA and ANR
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 14.07.2026
None appears for the parties on call. So far as WP(C)/2543/2016 is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner on the last occasion, i.e., 28.08.2025 had informed that she could not contact her client. So far as WP(C)/5301/2014 is concerned, on the last occasion, i.e., 27.05.2025, there was no representation. This Court had however given a further chance with an observation that in case of failure to represent, this Court would pass appropriate orders. It clearly appears that the parties are not interested to pursue the litigation which are pending since the year 2014 and 2016. In view of the above, both the writ petition stands dismissed for want
Page No.# 3/3 of prosecution. Liberty is however given to the parties to file restoration petition(s), if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant