Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1202 (GAU)

DIPANKAR DEY v. SMT. TANUSHREE DEY and 2 ORS

WP(C)/5136/2016 · 2026-05-06

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010226172016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5136/2016 DIPANKAR DEY S/O LT. NANI GOPAL DEY R/O FLAT NO. 101/M, VISHAL HOUSING COMPLEX, MALIGAON CHARIALI, GUWAHATI - 781012. VERSUS SMT. TANUSHREE DEY and 2 ORS D/O SRI DIPANKAR DEY C/O SRI TAPASH KUMAR DAS RAILWAY QTR. NO. 245/A, NEW GOSHALA, GUWAHATI - 781011, KAMRUP M, ASSAM. 2:SMT. NIRMALI TALUKDAR COUNSELLOR COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN - 781009. 3:SMT. ASEEMA CHETIA CONCILIATOR COURT OF THE CPRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT GUWAHATI KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN - 781009 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A DUTTA, MR.A GANGULY Advocate for the Respondent : MR.U K NAIRR-1, MR.M P SARMA(R-1),MR.T J MAHANTA(R- 2),MR.A K SARMA(R-1),MSW YHOSHII(R-1),MS.P BHATTACHARYA(R-2),MR.A BHATTACHARYA(R-2),MR.A BARUA(R-2) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 07-05-2026 None appears on call for the petitioner consecutively for two occasions including today. Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 is present. The issue involved in this writ petition pertains to the settlement of the disputes between the parties regarding maintenance. The petitioner remains unrepresented, which indicates that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE. Comparing Assistant