Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1190 (GAU)

TINKU DEORI v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK and 3 ORS

WP(C)/3525/2016 · 2026-03-31

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010017982016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3525/2016 TINKU DEORI S/O LT. NARESWAR DEORI VIL- N.1 GERIMARI MANGALDOI, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK and 3 ORS A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDER TAKINGS ACT, 1970, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT 5, SANSAD MARD, SANSAD MARD ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK CIRCLE OFFICE N.E. CIRCLE AND ALSO REP. H.R.D. DEPARTMENT OF BANK G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI - 781005. 3:SHRI RAMEN DEKA S/O SHRI HARINATH DEKA JABARIKUCHI P.O. BARKALA CHOUKA P.S. MANGALDOI DIST. DARRANG ASSAM 4:THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICER DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE MANGALDOI DIST. DARRAN Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.R DEKA, MR.S S GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A GANGULYR-1,2, MR.A DUTTA(R-1,2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 01.04.2026 Mr. S. S. Goswami, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, on the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant