HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED and 2 ORS. v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 3 ORS
WP(C)/2488/2016 · 2026-03-12
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2016
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1169 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2016 DAILYLAW 1169 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170342016
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2488/2016 HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LIMITED and 2 ORS.
SOUTH TOWER 4TH FLOOR, SCOPE MINAR COMPLEX, LAXMINAGAR DIST. CENTRE, NEW DELHI- 3.
2: HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.
REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE SAID CORPORATION 75-C PARK STREET KOLKATA- 16.
3: CACHAR PAPER MILL A UNIT OF HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.
REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF CACHAR PAPER MILL OF HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.
P.O.- PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788802 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR SECRETARY, SHRAM SAKTI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GHY- 6.
3:ABU BAKKAR S/O- HAJI NIMAR ALI
Page No.# 2/3 VILL. and P.O.- PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788802 ASSAM.
4:THE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT GUWAHATI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S SARMA, MS.C CHAKRABORTY,MR.J ROY,MR.S BORTHAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : MS.S DASGUPTA R-3, GA, ASSAM,MR .B MALAKAR(R- 3),MR.N DHAR(R-3),MR. T U LASKAR(R-3)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 13.03
.2026 Heard Mr. P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Malakar, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
2. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the award dated 31.07.2015 passed by the CGIT-cum-Labour Court in reference to the case No. 40 of 2013, whereby the respondent No.3 was directed to be reinstated without any back wages.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition the Corporation came to be hold up and a liquidator was appointed.
4. Mr. P. Choudhury, learned counsel represents the liquidator on written instructions submits that the liquidator does not wish to proceed with the writ
Page No.# 3/3 petition any further.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
6. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
7. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any also dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant