Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1131 (CAL)

MANISHA BHATTACHARJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

WPA/29927/2016 · 2026-09-16

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

68 1166..0099..22002266 Court No. 652 D.Hira WPA 29927 of 2016 Manisha Bhattacharjee Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ekramul Bari, Mr. Sk. Imtiaj Uddin. … for the petitioner 1. Mr. Ekramul Bari, learned advocate is appearing for the petitioner. 2. He submits that during pendency of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation. Hence, her prayer for compassionate appointment is an infructuous one now. 3. In consideration of the submissions as above, let the writ petition be disposed of being infructuous. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)