Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2016 DAILYLAW 1113 (CAL)

MACKEIL ISPAT AND FORGING LTD AND ORS v. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

APOT/447/2016 · 2026-07-07

Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2016

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OD-14 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APOT/447/2016 MACKEIL ISPAT AND FORGING LTD AND ORS VS STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI Date : July 7, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Saubhik Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Suchisattwa Mallick, Adv. …for the appellants The Court: Learned Advocate initially filing the appeal submits that, the appellant no.1 went into corporate insolvency and restructuring programme. A new management took over the appellant no.1. The new management, however, did not engage the Advocate-on-record who filed the appeal. This is the second call. Since, the Advocates who filed the initial appeal are without instructions, the appellants are treated to be not represented as no new Advocate appears today even in the second call. APOT/447/2016 along with connected applications are dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) (MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI, J.) KB AR (CR)