: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR M.F.A. No.103030/2015 (LAC) BETWEEN 1. SHRI.CHANDRAPPA S/O BASAPPA INGALAGI @ YADALLI, AGE :48 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 2. SHRI.YALLAPPA S/O BASAPPA INGALAGI @ YADALLI, AGE :40 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 3. SHRI.RUDRAPPA S/O RAMAPPA GANAGI, AGE :40 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 4. SHRI.SATTEPPA S/O NAGAPPA GANAGI AGE :70 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, : 2 : DIST:BELGAVI. 5. SHRI.BASAPPA S/O YANKAPPA YADALLI, AGE :49 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 6. SHRI.RAMAPPA S/O YANKAPPA YADALLI AGE :45 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 7. SHRI.BHIMAPPA S/O YANKAPPA YADALLI AGE :40 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. 8. SHRI.SUBASH S/O BASAPPA INGALAGI @ YADALLI, AGE :55 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:SATTIGERI VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, DIST:BELGAVI. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI BASAVARAJ BYAKOD, ADV.) AND 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BAILHONGAL SUB-DIVISION, BAILHONGAL. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, DAK BUNGALOW, SHAHAPUR, : 3 : BELAGAVI. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH ZONE, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAPURA, TQ & DIST:VIJAYAPURA. ..... RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.54(1) OF LA ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.02.2006 PASSED IN LAC. NO.285/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) SAUNDATTI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT It is submitted that in claim petition filed before the reference Court, the claimants had sought compensation at the rate Rs.3,00,000/- per acre. 2. The subject matter of the appeal is less than Rs.10.00 lakhs and the same is not maintainable before this Court, in view of provisions of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964. The Registry is directed to return the original papers to the counsel for the appellants, after taking photocopies of the same along with the quantum of Court fee permitted to be refunded. : 4 : Six weeks time is granted to the appellants to re-present the same before the jurisdictional District Court. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. 3. In view of the disposal of the appeal, I.A.No.2/2015 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is rejected. However, it is open for the appellants to move before the appellate Court. Sd/- JUDGE Naa