APHC010506002015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10792/2015 Between: 1. BAVIRISETTI SRINIVAS, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 77-39/1-23, PAYAKAPURAM, FIRE STATION ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TOWN WORKS SECTION, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 & 2 in issuing notice Nos.149T to 152T & 160T dt.27.03.2015 directing them and his staff at different counters to vacate his project site in which he have a licensed establishment in an extent of Ac.1.04 cents on the bund of Ryves canal in S.No. 1015/A(P) in Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada in which the petitioner is running an amusement park, water park, restaurant etc., under the tripartite agreement viz. Development and Management agreement between them, the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation and also the State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary to Government Youth Advancement, Tourism and Cultural Department under which the petitioner having licence to run the said project for a period of fifteen years from 2003 which continues up to 2018 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and against the principles of natural justice and the Constitutional guarantees and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the said project site in any manner what so ever during the currency of his tripartite agreement dt.18.06.2003 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 14272 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased issue an interim order against the respondents staying all further proceedings pursuant to the notice of the 1St respondent in notice Nos.149T to 152T & 160T, dt.27.03.2015 pertaining to his project site in which the petitioner running water park, amusement park, restaurant etc.., during the pendency of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri M. Venkata Siva Teja, learned counsel representing Sri A. Syam Sundar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has rendered infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 17.06.2026 ikn THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10792 of 2015 Dated : 17.06.2026 IKN