Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2015 DAILYLAW 891 (ORI)

SUDHANSHU S.TRIPATHY v. UTKAL GRAMEEN BANK

WP(C)/14358/2015 · 2026-09-10

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2015

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 14358 of 2015 CNR No. ODHC010165622015 Sudhanshu S. Tripathy & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. J. Biswal, Advocate -versus- Utkal Grameen Bank & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Sarangi, Sr. Advocate CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 10.09.2026 Order No. 15 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Pursuant to order dtd.18.08.2026, Mr. S.K. Sarangi, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the Opp. Party-Bank produced the result sheet of the Petitioners in the sealed cover. The same after being opened, it was found that none of the Petitioners have qualified in the test for their promotion from Scale II to III. The result sheet be kept in a sealed cover as before. 4. In view of the result sheet so produced and since none of the Petitioners have qualified, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the Petitioners contended that the writ petition be treated as not pressed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha