MOHAMMED MUSHTAQ v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/8/2015 · 2026-07-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2015
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 847 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2015 DAILYLAW 847 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 8/2015
Mohammed Mushtaq …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Slathia, Dy. AG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 21.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three consecutive dates and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 21.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 31